Showing posts with label Divide and Conquer. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Divide and Conquer. Show all posts

12.11.2017

Alabama Special

Come now; surely he could say what he means—just narrow it down to #13...Basest of bases, GOP voters, are just fine...

4.19.2017

Good-Bye Is Not Good Enough

When it comes after decades of his particular brand of toxic spew. Not only did it play so large a role in poisoning political discourse, it also inspired a quite literal body count. Now that he's out of prime time, the mockery is as deserved as could be.





Video: "Bill O'Reilly Tells Black Professor That He Looks Like A Drug Dealer"
So apt (gross as it necessarily is)...
Tom Tomorrow has a thread here, about his O'Reilly cartoons. After the first was published in 2000, he happened to meet the man...
I hadn't realized it before, but size must be yet one more thing he's used to intimidate.

Finally...

12.12.2016

Mainstreaming The Rewrite

LA Times forced to apologize, after readers objections followed a Travel section article on former internment camp National Parks (Tule Lake and Manzanar). This because the paper published wingnut troll complaints about the Parks' "anti-U.S. remake of history." Complete with the usual tropes about "loyalty to Japan," and families living high-hog off the government, while GIs fought for their freedom.

Who knows if publication was OK'd by an ignoramus, or if it was because we need to understand the minds of the poor downtrodden Trump voters. The less than vigorous apology—
Davan Maharaj, editor-in-chief and publisher of The Times, said the letters did not meet the newspaper's standards for "civil, fact-based discourse" and should not have been published.

11.17.2016

Rewrite Redux

Trump surrogate says it will be no sweat to register Muslims, because Japanese-American internment went so smoothly.

Interviewed by Megyn Kelly, as she cues him to use his inside voice—
KELLY: Come on. You're not — you're not proposing we go back to the days of internment camps, I hope.

HIGBIE: No, no, no. I'm not proposing that at all, Megyn, but what I am saying is we need to protect America from —

KELLY: You know better than to suggest that. I mean, that's the kind of stuff that gets people scared, Carl.

HIGBIE: Right, but it's — I'm just saying there is precedent for it, and I'm not saying I agree with it, but in this case I absolutely believe that a regional based —
She tops it off with this—
KELLY: You can't be citing Japanese internment camps as precedent for anything the president-elect is gonna do.
The language is completely calculated, always. Here, it's Japanese internment, to imply that America's concentration camps were filled with war-time enemies. To obscure the truth: they they were families of ordinary citizens, deprived of homes, businesses, and freedom.

Certainly, they floated this after 9-11. And camp survivors were quick to oppose post-9/11 discrimination against Muslims, recognizing as they did that those who would exploit the situation were directing fearful citizens to find scapegoats in other, vulnerable citizens.

Great rewrite job now, when direct survivors of America's camps will not be with us for many more years.

11.14.2016

Impresario

Shakezula, on media reaction to Steve Bannon's being named Trump's Karl Rove
In the Trumpnited States of MAGAmerica, a president who makes a white supremacist one of his top advisers is not divisive. Noting that the white supremacist advising the president is in fact a white supremacist is divisive and irresponsible. So everyone should shut up.
Trump spoke not only to a dying demographic of elderly whites. Through his social media enabled bullying and vulgarity, Trump also spoke the language of young enraged white men. Like neo-Nazis and Klansmen, they may have not have voted in the past, but they turned out last week.

That there were no longer norms of behavior was obvious throughout this, the first Twitter election. But I hadn't made the connection between likely Trump voters and the last few years of reports about the behavior of young male gamers. Some have immersed themselves in social media campaigns to terrorize women; others joined a chorus that cheered on threats of rape and death.

I wonder if anything will ever come out about Bannon's previous gaming business ventures, immediately prior to his taking over Breitbart. If he wasn't directly involved in encouraging online terror, he was positioned to see marketing opportunity. Mother Jones noted this in September—
... he took over at Breitbart News in 2012. Bannon may have applied his web knowledge gained from his time at IGE and Affinity to Breitbart News, which he transformed into the preeminent destination for the internet-savvy, meme-centric alt-right—in part by stoking the anger behind Gamergate, which saw harassment of female gamers by their male peers.
How could they not have been thrilled to turn out for President Sexual Predator.

11.05.2016

Wisdom

Interesting account of going door-to-door in West Dayton, OH—
Mostly talked to older African-Americans. When I launched into the boilerplate about how this is likely to be a very close, very important election, etc etc etc, they’d often give me a raised-eyebrow look that said, very clearly, "do you really think I don't understand what's at stake with this election?" and we'd quickly move on to logistics–polling locations, early voting hours, etc.
...

Only a few people want to take advantage of the captive audience to talk politics, but one woman, just getting home from a double shift as I arrived to her house, was pure gold. I'm going to reconstruct my favorite part of her rant as faithfully as possible, but I'm not doing is justice–it was just a marvelous, angry, hilarious rant. The gist of it:
Look, I get it, you white people* had a hard time with Obama being president so you need a racist president. I get it. I don't like it but I get it. But what I don't get is why you needed a racist who is so goddamn crazy and stupid! Couldn't you find a racist who could actually know how to run the damn government? I mean, I wouldn't vote for him–he'd still be bad for people like me–but at least he'd know what he's doing? What good does it do the damn white people when Trump shits the bed? It's not like there's some other special country they move to when he takes this country down. We get a black president and he does a pretty good job, and your response is murder-suicide? You white people need to get smarter about how you do this racism thing.
*she interjected caveats about how her use of "you white people" should not be construed to include people such as myself and Obama/Clinton supporters generally, so this didn't come off as hostile or accusatory as the words on the page might make it appear....
Really no need to interject the caveats, when the crazy and stupid is in everyone's face. But, how could this racism be anything other than suicidally crazy and stupid?

8.20.2016

One Thing So Unlike The Other

Yesterday: Trump's awkward photo op in Louisiana flood zone. Steve M. picks this up, from Guardian coverage: a local holds forth on Trump's visit and on, uhh, other subjects—
"This is his stomping grounds," said Greg Patterson, who was cleaning muck from his store called the Pit Stop. The idea that a billionaire from Manhattan could describe the working-class corner of Louisiana as "his stomping grounds" did not strike Patterson as contradictory.

"We've got 2,000 houses damaged just in this area alone," he said, stretching his arm out to the south. "These people are already back in their homes, working to repair them. It's not like down in the Ninth Ward."

...

"I mean that's a bunch of government-owned housing," Patterson said. "Nobody here is looking for handouts or waiting on the government. These are Trump's people."
As the Guardian's reporter adds, there have been over 60,000 applications for FEMA aid.

Steve notes—
Of course, people like Patterson might literally believe that they can accept aid from FEMA, or handouts from Trump, and still be "self-sufficient" -- unlike Those People in New Orleans -- because, well, y'know.
In Comments, Jon Gallagher adds—
"Those people" in the Ninth Ward were not coping with a flooded river (and just in case you live by a river and don't know this: RIVERS FLOOD, IT'S WHAT THEY DO!).

The Ninth Ward was coping with the failure of a canal built through their neighborhood by the US Army Corps of Engineers to carry shipping traffic between the Mississippi Rive and Lake Pontchartrain. In other words, they weren't building houses in a flood plain, then expecting the government to bail them out when the inevitable happens, like white folks do. The government brought the flood to them, and could barely lift a finger to help them.

So, hey hard working Mr Greg Patterson, consider taking responsibility for your own self, and move out of the flood plain. The Mississippi has a tendency to move whenever and wherever it it wants (see "The Control of Nature", John McPhee, and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flood_Control_Act_of_1928, and http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2011/05/what-weve-done-to-the-mississippi-river-an-explainer/239058/) and we taxpayers have been on the hook for decades to keep you and yours dry. Now that Global Climate Change (that you probably don't believe in) is well past its tipping point, you need to move to higher ground.
Obama, who happened to be on vacation, postponed visiting the area—just as Governor Edwards had requested, to avoid the strain on services that would be caused by having to provide the necessary security. On that topic of media comparisons of Obama to a previous vacation from the White House, Steve notes—
... In the current flooding, 13 people are dead and 40,000 homes have been damaged. In Katrina, at least 986 people died and 1 million homes were damaged. The current flooding is horrible, but Bush was faced with a much worse disaster, and dealt with it inadequately. In the current crisis, the heads of FEMA and the Department of Homeland Security have been to flood zone, 20 parishes have already been declared federal disaster areas, and quite a bit of assistance is already being provided. If the federal response turns out to be insufficient, that's a reason to grumble about the president. But that's not what we're hearing. We're hearing payback for the criticism of Bush's apparent indifference to Katrina.
Also, tengrain here, on what is and is not "Katrina."

8.15.2016

New Achievements In Kicking Irony's Corpse

tengrain previews Trump's "national security speech"—
Trump is also expected to propose creating a new, ideological test for admission to the country that would assess a candidate's stances on issues like religious freedom, gender equality and gay rights. ... applicants would be vetted to see whether they support American values like tolerance and pluralism.

8.10.2016

Once Upon A Time

Digby finds a 2008 Newsweek story containing this bit of history, about "the 1994 Reform Riders campaign, a nationwide bus tour designed to build support for President Clinton’s health-care reform agenda"—
The idea was to emulate the famous 1960's Freedom Rides but the campaign was plagued with protesters. In Portland, Ore., the route was blocked by an "angry anti-Clinton mob" who had their own bus, which was covered in red tape and dragged by a tow truck with a sign reading THIS IS CLINTON CARE. A plane bearing protest signs flew overhead. Hillary Clinton met the Reform Rider activists in Seattle where she delivered a speech on health care. The result was a mob scene. ...
Newsweek's article was based Carl Bernstein's book, Hillary Clinton, A Woman in Charge. The magazine quoted Bernstein here—
By the time the caravan had reached Seattle the threat of violence was constant. All week, talk radio hosts, both in the Northwest and on national broadcasts, implored their listeners to confront the Reform Riders to "show Hillary" their feelings about her. This "call to arms," as she described it, attracted menacing hordes, many of whom identified themselves as militia members, tax resisters and anti-abortion militants. She estimated that at least half of the 4,500 people in the audience of her Seattle speech were protesters. She agreed for the first time to wear a bulletproof vest. Rarely had she felt endangered, but this was different. During her speech, the catcalls, screaming, and heckling drowned out much of her remarks. When she left the stage and got into a limousine, hundreds of protesters surrounded the car. They were rabid with hatred. Several arrests were made by the Secret Service, which impounded two guns and a knife."
It's a story I missed, back in the day before bloggers tried filling in media blanks. But this MO is familiar from the 2010 "Tea Party" mobs threatening Congressional Democrats prior to the AACA vote.

The usual suspects had their mobs whipped up against their own self-interest, aided by special malevolence directed at the hated Hillary. As Digby says of Clinton facing the 1994 mobs, "She had to wear a bulletproof vest because people were trying to kill her --- over her health care plan."

"A Nation Within A Nation"

Charles Pierce on the DOJ report on "the racial catastrophe that is the Baltimore Police Department"—
The history of the numbers—and, therefore, how things went so badly wrong in Baltimore—is a sorry and not entirely inexplicable story. Not if you are familiar with the history of how things go so badly wrong in this country. Race is shot throughout the report; the numbers draw a clear and vivid picture of that. Everything in the report comes down to the disinclination of the civic and political power to grant the freedom of their constitutional rights to its African American citizens. Nothing in the report proceeds without that simple fact. From fugitive slave patrols to this report, the history of American law enforcement shows that so much of American law enforcement hasn't any more idea of how to solve this nation's original sin than does any other institution of American society. Except these people have badges. And guns.

1.06.2016

Different Strokes

A year-end travesty in Cincinnati.

In that link above, Charles Pierce wrote on 12/29—
I have to admit that it took a day before I could sit down and write about the thoroughgoing bag-job that was the official investigation into the summary execution-by-cop of Tamir Rice, a 12-year old who apparently had the misfortune of having a growth spurt in the fevered mind of one Officer Timothy Loehmann, who found it necessary to shoot Rice down before he could grow any bigger and more threatening. When will African American children learn not to grow so suddenly into monsters in the minds of our brave folks in blue?...
Pierce adds—
There certainly is no point in emphasizing the damn irony that Ohio is an "open carry" state so, even if the cops assumed Rice was 18, and they also assumed his gun was real, they had no cause even to stop him, let alone open fire. Listen to the spiel that Wayne LaPierre unspools every time he's in a room with more than four people listening: arm yourselves, because the world is a hellscape of violent Others who are coming for you and your children. At its heart, open carry is about open season on the people who scare you. It's certainly not about an absolute Second Amendment right that applies to black people as well as white. Open carry is about You and the Others, and so is the training of our modern, militarized police forces. If only Tamir Rice had not been born with that congenital ability to become huge and threatening the way he did in the mind of Timothy Loehmann. If only...

A media spectacle in Oregon's (white) hinterlands.

No cause for concern; as an ABC Twitter headline put it, "Peaceful protest followed by Oregon wildlife refuge action."

On January 3 tengrain observed—
Say, we have not heard from our old pals, the land-grabbing, tax-cheating, grifting Bundy family of Nevada. If it is an election year, the Bundy's must be up to something.
A couple days later, tengrain may have been correct here, in predicting the situation could be ended by a shut-off of power to the refuge.

But Roy Edroso is certainly right about these characters' efforts to seize federal land—
... which I guarantee you would not in such a case be equitably distributed among We the People, but would instead get funneled to the usual shitheels whose cries for devolution of government resources always come down to "gimme."

12.11.2015

Some Truth; No Consequences

His party found it no big deal when he claimed that "Mexico is sending us their rapists and drug dealers." And they were rather quiet when he wanted to emulate Ike.

But Trump still leads the pack, so the GOP has finally taken a stand: that barring Muslims entry to the U.S. is "Un-American."

The supposed pivot is almost amusing in suggesting that, until this, Trump had not gone too far... And it predictably signaled the media that criticism of Trump is now OK.

Why, the NYT has gone so far as to run this.

tengrain says, "I for one am glad to welcome the NYTimes to the blogosphere, where we've been saying for more than a decade that the Right has lost its mind and has spiraled into fascism."

The new forthrightness will last just until Trump is out of the picture. At which time the media pack will take the departure as their cue to pretend the GOP has returned to sanity. Along with that will go the corollary: that whichever extremist becomes the nominee will then be deemed "serious" and "presidential."

Good discussion by Sam Seder and Cliff Schecter (starting at :30)–on the media's pretense that Trump has now been renounced by the GOP. That's when the reality is that even as the candidates stumble over themselves to condemn Trump for saying such awful things, they all affirm that if he becomes the nominee, they will vote for him.

There certainly has been no denunciation. As Sam says, the candidates are simply running against each other, responding to every statement from Trump with, "I have a different proposal." Republican "condemnation" of anti-Muslim statements is mere policy quibble, as in Jeb's previous "we should only let in Christians" line about Syrian refugees. The GOP immigration "debate" is all about who will build the biggest wall and mete out the cruelest punishment to immigrants and refugees.

After decades of their party's ginning up anti-immigrant fear and hatred, Republican voters are eager for just such immigrant-bashing and deportation as Trump's. As Sam puts it, "The suit has been tailored for years; Donald Trump just walked into it..."

And as Cliff says, Trump simply came out and said things that until now were supposed to be only implied. Cliff also brought up a Republican of yore: Margaret Chase Smith, who managed to get at least a few other Republicans to join her in censuring McCarthy.

As it happens, I've been reading this: J. Fred MacDonald on how television as a mass medium arrived about the same time as the Cold War, with anti-communism providing the new medium a programming theme. Trump certainly is reminiscent of the author's description of an earlier media phenomenon—
Senator McCarthy appeared on many TV discussion programs in the early 1950s... Always, McCarthy demonstrated his peculiar argumentative style: making broad charges certain to garner headlines the next day; dropping names, dates, and specifics even if they were inaccurate; and dominating any opposing views by undermining the credibility of speakers on the show. ...on June 21, 1953, for example, McCarthy employed accusations, oversimplifications, and interruptions to dominate a discussion... To one reviewer, the senator's debating "acrobatics" were by turn bland and savagely harsh for vocal effects"...

McCarthy was a good television performer. . TV critic Jack Gould described him as "a master...[who]skillfully exploits an elementary rule of showmanship—a sensation or two never fails to hold an audience." And his message was believed. McCarthy continued to hold great popularity among the American people...
It was only after he took on the Army in the spring and summer of 1953 that McCarthy was finally stopped.
...The [Eisenhower] White House would not cooperate with him. With elections in the fall, Republicans tried to end the hearings as soon as possible, as McCarthy's sullen attitude toward the Army quickly became a debilitating revelation of his own pettiness and ambition.
Later that year the Senate voted to censure McCarthy. He upped his game by attacking Eisenhower, but the censure had ended his official power. When the Senate changed hands he lost his committee chairmanship and public platform.

If television finally helped expose McCarthy as a fraud, MacDonald notes that coverage of the Army hearings was "no ringing victory for public affairs television"—
The two networks that covered the hearings live, ABC and Dumont, did so because they had virtually no morning or afternoon programming. With a roster of sponsored soap operas and game shows, CBS rejected the hearings, preferring to air a 45-minute daily summation at 11:30 P.M. NBC offered the hearings live for two days. But since those two days cost $125,000 in lost advertising revenue, that network also opted for a late-evening summary.
1953 stakes; one can adjust for a different value for the dollar, but there's no comparing the astronomically higher level of media stakes today.

Another comparison with 1953 is more apt, though. Media coverage of Trump's demagoguery can be seen in view of the fact that McCarthy's anti-communism was not to be discredited by his downfall. Look at MacDonald's conclusion, and just update "anti-Communism"—
McCarthy's fall ... did not signify the end of anti-Communism as an alluring mind-set. McCarthyism was only one of the more virulent strands of this popular hatred of the political left. Thriving on fear and ignorance, McCarthyism represented oppressive power emanating from unsubstantiated accusation. It pursued enemies of the state where there where no enemies. It was aggressive and egotistical, colorful and falsely reassuring. The Army-McCarthy hearings only demonstrated that McCarthyism had overstepped the boundaries of permissibility in American politics as well as television. They did not demonstrate popular determination to reappraise anti-communism or to approach the East-West struggle in more realistic terms. Anti-Communism continued to thrive in politics and video.
An opponent will always be accused of softness on immigration (or terrorism, or political correctness, or War on Christians). Trump invented none of this, and any will serve as the torches to be picked up when Trumpism ends.

11.19.2015

Holding The Line

Since the newest attack in Paris, governors of states here have been taking a brave stance: against women and children.

At Hullabaloo: Tom Sullivan on who was turned away in 1939.

Syrian refugees already face years of screening, as in the case of the two families described here. Gaining admission to the U.S. has never been quick or easy for most refugees. That's something that doesn't change—unless even more hurdles are added, out of xenophobia and political calculation.

In this 1998 collection of essays, Charles Simic recalls nine years of his childhood—
"Displaced persons" is the name they had for us back in 1945, and that's what we truly were. As you sit watching bombs falling in some old documentary, or the armies advancing against each other, villages and towns going up in fire and smoke, you forget about the people huddled in the cellar. Mr. and Mrs. Innocent and their families paid dearly n this century for just being there. Condemned by history, as Marxists were fond of saying, perhaps belonging to a wrong class, wrong ethnic group, wrong religion—what have you—they were and continue to be an unpleasant reminder of all the philosophical and nationalist utopias gone wrong....

My family, like so many others, got to see the world for free thanks to Hitler's wars and Stalin's takeover of Eastern Europe... Small fry, we made no decisions ourselves. It was all arranged for us by the world leaders of the times. Like so many others who were displaced, we had no ambition to stray far beyond our neighborhood in Belgrade....

...

It's hard for people who have never experienced it to truly grasp what it means to lack proper documents. We read every day about our own immigration officers, using and misusing their recently acquired authority to turn back suspicious aliens from our borders. The pleasure of humiliating the powerless must not be underestimated. Even as a young boy, I could see that was the case. Everywhere there are bureaucrats, the police state is an ideal.

I remember standing in endless lines in Paris at police headquarters to receive or renew residential permits. It seems like that's all we ever did when we lived there. We'd wait all day only to discover that the rules had changed since the last time, that they now required, for instance, something as absurd as my mother's parents' marriage certificate or her grade-school diploma, even though she was in possession of a French diploma since she did her post-graduate studies in Paris. As we'd stand there pondering the impossibility of what they were asking of us, we'd be listening to someone at the next window trying to convey in poor French how the family's house had burned, how they'd left in a hurry with only one small suitcase, and so on, to which the official would shrug his shoulders and proceed to inform them that unless the documents were procured promptly, the residence permit would be denied.
...

The mail didn't travel very swiftly, of course. We would go nuts every day for weeks waiting for the mailman, who couldn't stand the sight of us since we were always pestering him, and finally, somehow, the documents would arrive thanks to a distant relative. Then they had to be translated by an official translator who, of course, couldn't make heads or tails out of the dog-eared fifty-year old entry in a provincial Balkan school or church registry. In any case, eventually we'd go back to the long line only to discover that they were not needed after all, but something else was. Every passport office, every police station, every consulate had a desk with a wary and bad-tempered official who suspected us of not being what we claimed to be…. The officials we met knew next to nothing about where we came from and why, but that did not prevent them from passing judgment on us....

Immigration, exile, being uprooted and made a pariah may be the most effective way yet devised to impress on an individual the arbitrary nature of his or her own existence. ...

...we got used to the idea.... Being nobody struck me personally as being far more interesting than being somebody. The streets were full of these "somebodys" putting on confident airs. Half the time I envied them; half the time I looked down on them with pity. I knew something they didn't, something hard to come by unless history gives you a good kick in the ass: how superfluous and insignificant in any grand scheme mere individuals are. And how pitiless are those who have no understanding that this could be their fate too.

I stepped off the boat in New York City on August 10, 1954, with my mother and my brother....

11.13.2015

All Wet

Writing at Hullabaloo, Digby says—
"I must confess that I'm a little bit surprised that so few journalists seem to have been familiar with "Operation Wetback" or that Donald Trump had been extolling its virtues on the campaign trail for months. I guess they don't actually listen to what he's saying.
From Digby's piece in Salon
In the debate on Tuesday, Trump reiterated the plan which half of Republicans in the U.S. support. He promised to build a wall along the nearly 2,000 mile border and to make Mexico pay for it. He also once more committed to rounding up and deporting all illegal immigrants. As he has in the past, he referenced President Eisenhower's program from the 1950s, fatuously insisting that it must be "nice" since everybody "liked Ike," even as he assiduously avoided calling the plan by its name: "Operation Wetback."

Here's Trump’s exact quote from the debate:
Let me just tell you that Dwight Eisenhower, good president, great president, people liked him. "I like Ike," right? The expression. "I like Ike." Moved a 1.5 million illegal immigrants out of this country, moved them just beyond the border. They came back.

Moved them again beyond the border, they came back. Didn’t like it. Moved them way south. They never came back.

(LAUGHTER)

Dwight Eisenhower. You don't get nicer. You don't get friendlier. They moved a 1.5 million out. We have no choice. We have no choice.
Indeed, Trump has been saying this all along. Back in September, the Washington Post responded with the
history of how "repatriation" actually was conducted

In Mexicali, Mexico, temperatures can reach 125 degrees as heat envelops an arid desert. Without a body of water nearby to moderate the climate, the heavy sun is relentless — and deadly.

During the summer of 1955, this is where hundreds of thousands of Mexicans were "dumped" after being discovered as migrants who crossed the U.S.-Mexico border illegally. Unloaded from buses and trucks carrying several times their capacity, the deportees stumbled into the Mexicali streets with few possessions and no way of getting home.

This was strategic: the more obscure the destination within the Mexican interior, the less opportunities they would have to return to America. But the tactic also proved to be dangerous, as the migrants were left without resources to survive.

After one such round-up and transfer in July, 88 people died from heat stroke.

At another drop-off point in Nuevo Laredo, the migrants were "brought like cows" into the desert.

Among the over 25 percent who were transported by boat from Port Isabel, Texas, to the Mexican Gulf Coast, many shared cramped quarters in vessels resembling an "eighteenth century slave ship" and "penal hell ship."

These deportation procedures, detailed by historian Mae M. Ngai, were not anomalies. They were the essential framework of Operation Wetback — a concerted immigration law enforcement effort implemented by President Dwight D. Eisenhower in 1954 — and the deportation model that Donald Trump says he intends to follow.
In the Hullabaloo post above, Digby adds this—
I noticed this morning that Luke Russert and Tamron Hall both refused to use the word "Wetback" when describing Eisenhower's program. This is a big mistake. People need to know exactly what they called Donald Trump's "nice, humane, 'I like Ike'" program. It brings the reality of what he's talking about right home. His voters won't care. They probably like it. But normal people will recognize it for what it is.
Certainly, our native Nazis recognize Trump's shout-out; via tengrain
The New Confederacy isn't even trying to hide it anymore: White Supremacists Are Thrilled Donald Trump Mentioned "Operation Wetback"
White supremacists are praising Donald Trump for citing a 1950s U.S. government policy that deported hundreds of thousands of Mexican immigrants.

After Trump mentioned the policy, called "Operation Wetback," at Tuesday night’s Republican presidential debate, Richard B. Spencer, the president of the white nationalist National Policy Institute, tweeted, "Operation Wetback, fuck yeah!"

... A post that ran on the white nationalist site Vdare.com and the white supremacist site the Daily Stormer called it a "milestone in the immigration debate."

9.29.2015

If Only She Could Be Cloned

It's hard for women in politics—or, in pretty much anything public—to avoid being seen as shrill (or, whatever). Given that atmosphere, Elizabeth Warren never fails to impress with her calmness and talent for explaining things to an average person, without talking down. If her abilities are not entirely rare, they seldom make an appearance in our public life.

There were her questions at this July hearing.

Add this example of Sen. Warren's ability to bring up taboo and get to truths.

The influx of trolls to Pierce's comment thread is testimony to the fear her effectiveness inspires in the wingers.

6.19.2015

Truisms

It was an attack by a lone wolf; nothing at all to do with race/domestic terrorism/guns...

Pay no mind to the NYT's side-by-side headlines—
Suspect Wore Symbols of White Supremacy/
A Church Long at the Fore of the Fight for Equality
If it's unlikely the murderer knew the history of this particular church, there's no mistaking his choice of target: Southern Black Church, the institution where the previously voiceless have been heard and have built their political strength. And an institution so often targeted.

If he didn't know history, Dylann Roof did "know" other things; as the Times reported
Law enforcement officials identified Mr. Roof, 21, as the suspect in the mass shooting at an African-American church in Charleston on Wednesday night that left nine dead, including the pastor, Clementa C. Pinckney. Mr. Roof was arrested Thursday in North Carolina.

A cousin of Mr. Pinckney who had spoken to a witness, Sylvia Johnson, told NBC that the gunman entered the church, asked for the pastor and sat next to him during Bible study before opening fire. "I have to do it," he said, according to Ms. Johnson. "You rape our women and you're taking over our country. And you have to go." The shooting was being investigated as a hate crime.
...

Heidi Beirich, the director of the Southern Poverty Law Center's intelligence project, which tracks the activity of American hate groups, said the gunman's reported comments reflected a major topic on white supremacist Internet forums, which are preoccupied with the idea that whites are being hugely victimized by blacks and no one is paying attention. The specter of white women being sexually assaulted by black men has a long history as well, she said: "It's probably the oldest racist trope we have in the U.S."
After observing Fox's viewership explain the massacre, Steve M. findings—
So, to sum up, the real villains here are Al Sharpton, Al Sharpton, Al Sharpton, Rachel Dolezal, the racist (and anti-Semitic) president and liberal media, legislators who turn churches into gun-free zones, and, of course, gay people.
Soon enough, that post needing updated, for Steve M. to add "War on Christianity"—
... on Fox & Friends, commentator E.W. Jackson (who got 45% of the vote as the GOP's candidate for [Virginia] lieutenant governor in 2013) said precisely that. He also called on church members (but only the men) to carry firearms in church...
JACKSON ... I am deeply concerned that this gunman chose to go into a church, because there does seem to be a rising hostility against Christians across this country because of our biblical views. And I just think it's something that we have to be aware of, and not create an atmosphere in which people take out their violent intentions against Christians.

And I would mention one other thing very quickly, and that is, I would urge pastors and men in these churches to prepare to defend themselves. It's sad, but I think we've got to arm ourselves -- at least have some people in the church who are prepared to defend the church when women and children are attacked.
It didn't take the NRA long. The murdered pastor was responsible for his own death and that of eight others; when he was alive and a state senator, he voted against concealed carry.

Charles Pierce
... This was not an unthinkable act. A man may have had a rat's nest for a mind, but it was well thought out. It was a cool, considered crime, as well planned as any bank robbery or any computer fraud. If people do not want to speak of it, or think about it, it's because they do not want to follow the story where it inevitably leads. It's because they do not want to follow this crime all the way back to the mother of all American crimes, the one that Denmark Vesey gave his life to avenge. What happened on Wednesday night was a lot of things. A massacre was only one of them.
Driftglass
Even after a day of tragedy and slaughter, the American Swastika continues to fly proudly and at full-mast in front of the South Carolina statehouse.

But maybe that's the point.

6.15.2015

Change Of Subject

This morning: NPR fluff about "'Jebcito,'" who "once mistakenly listed his ethnicity as Hispanic on a Florida voter registration form," and "once called himself the first 'Latino governor of the state of Florida.'" That story followed by furor over racial self-identification (of someone not a member of the Bush family): Rachel Dolezal's "passing" as black.

Dolezal is hardly the first: there is a long history of "passing" on different sides of the supposed divide. In a scholarly take here, Daniel J. Sharfstein notes such cases as the Nazi Party secretary and KKK Grand Dragon who had been a Jew, and the former speechwriter to George Wallace who wrote a best-selling "memoir" in the guise of being Native American.

Scharfstein also cites older history: that of the first free families of color and white mothers of black children. Those mothers had to find—
... new ways for their families and themselves to parse slavery, freedom and race, akin to James McBride's account in his memoir, "The Color of Water," of how his mother described her own identity while raising 12 African-American children. When McBride asked her about her parents, she would respond, "God made me." When he asked if she was white, her answer was, "I'm light-skinned."
James McBride's mother is an example Clever Sister brought up a couple days ago;Johnny Otis is another.

Considering Dolezal's multiple and apparently false claims of death threats and harassment, there may be a serious personality disorder involved. But the people it should concern are Dolezal, her family, and her associates. What should have been, at most, a local story in Spokane has been turned into day after day of national headlines.

That it's not simply a local story is no accident—not when it serves to reinforce a worldview of They get special privileges; the NAACP is phony; and the like. Once out, the story was amplified by the immense public shaming platform social media offers.

By now, it's become the perfect narrative for displacing stories that had been getting attention, like armed white cop vs. teenaged black girl clad only in swimwear. And for any attention paid to solid citizen reaction ("the blacks are the ones causing the problems and this 'racial tension.'").

5.01.2015

Shocker

So striking how a little sanity comes as a shocker these days. But Maryland State's Attorney Marilyn Mosby's May 1 statement—that the medical examiner had ruled Freddie Gray's death a homicide, and that six officers were being indicted on a number of charges—defied the usual mode of official reaction to suspicious deaths in police custody.

More sanity and common sense: while insisting that all citizens must receive equal protection under law, Mosby said
I come from five generations of law enforcement. My father was an officer. My mother was an officer, several of my aunts and uncles. My recently departed and beloved grandfather was one of the founding members of the first black police organization in Massachusetts.
Mosby's entire statement was impressive, and it ended a tumultuous week in my hometown.

For days following Freddie Gray's unexplained death in Baltimore police custody, large crowds protested peacefully. Ultimately, a much smaller number prompted media to helicopter into town to supply the usual round of looting video. After all, they are animals, whose inexplicable behavior is expected to preempt all questions about Gray's death.

Some reasons for frustration are suggested by the Baltimore Sun's 2014 report, "Undue Force." It describes a pattern of police behavior so egregious that money talked: since 2011, the city had "settled lawsuits claiming that police officers brazenly beat up alleged suspects," to the tune of about $5.7 million. Reporter Mark Puente's summary—
Over the past four years, more than 100 people have won court judgments or settlements related to allegations of brutality and civil rights violations. Victims include a 15-year-old boy riding a dirt bike, a 26-year-old pregnant accountant who had witnessed a beating, a 50-year-old woman selling church raffle tickets, a 65-year-old church deacon rolling a cigarette and an 87-year-old grandmother aiding her wounded grandson.

Those cases detail a frightful human toll. Officers have battered dozens of residents who suffered broken bones — jaws, noses, arms, legs, ankles — head trauma, organ failure, and even death, coming during questionable arrests. Some residents were beaten while handcuffed; others were thrown to the pavement.

And in almost every case, prosecutors or judges dismissed the charges against the victims — if charges were filed at all. In an incident that drew headlines recently, charges against a South Baltimore man were dropped after a video showed an officer repeatedly punching him — a beating that led the police commissioner to say he was "shocked."
Puente's pointed conclusions—
Such beatings, in which the victims are most often African-Americans, carry a hefty cost. They can poison relationships between police and the community, limiting cooperation in the fight against crime, the mayor and police officials say. They also divert money in the city budget — the $5.7 million in taxpayer funds paid out since January 2011 would cover the price of a state-of-the-art rec center or renovations at more than 30 playgrounds. And that doesn't count the $5.8 million spent by the city on legal fees to defend these claims brought against police.
In a very thoughtful interview, David Simon considers reasons why abusive police tactics he observed as a local journalist thirty years ago have become unrestrained.

As soon as disturbances followed Freddie Gray's April 27 funeral, the ready-made narrative was broadcast day after day. NPR, as is its wont, pretended to seriousness and "context"—by comparing this week in Baltimore (A CVS was looted!) with the toll of 1968 riots in Baltimore and D.C. Just a quick glance at Wikipedia shows that in Baltimore, 1968, "six people died, 700 were injured, and 5,800 were arrested. 1000 small businesses were damaged or robbed." According to the D.C. entry, there were twelve deaths, 1,097 injuries, over 6000 arrests. Fires damaged or destroyed 1,200 buildings, including over 900 stores.

To compare that history with recent events in Baltimore is absurd, but was made worse by the forum NPR gave two white police and fire veterans of '68. Though they noted that Baltimore this week was minor compared to '68, there were casually patronizing remarks along the lines of how in '68 "it wasn't all the people" in those neighborhoods who were troublemakers. This jumps out in the audio, but is also not hard to spot in the transcript
[Retired police sergeant] MATTSON: Yeah, well, I was in the police department 56 years ago. It was 98 percent white officers and a few percent black. There were no women on the street in the 1950s and '60s, not the early 1970s. And we actually walked beats without radios. We had call boxes. I'm going back a long time ago. And in '67, things started to change. We started to get cars and radios and all these kind of things. And we lost touch with the people. The police lost touch. And leadership started changing, and we started bringing in new people. We used to laugh about it and say, you know, lower them standards and you get what you going to get.

MARTIN: And do you mean race by that?

MATTSON: No, not race. Just the standards got lowered. I'm an old-timer. You know, I come from an old police department, and I still think the old way. I'm an old Baltimore kid. But everything, the political spectrum has changed. And, you know, it used to be the Irish were in charge and the Italians were in charge, and the now the blacks have maintained the city. They're in charge. So does the responsibility fall on them? I think so.
Fox's coverage is a given, but the rest of the pack were there with the usual they're just a bunch of thugs routine. While the right-wing Noise Machine hammered away at slandering the deceased, the Washington Post added more fodder, by obligingly printing this leak—
A prisoner sharing a police transport van with Freddie Gray told investigators that he could hear Gray "banging against the walls" of the vehicle and believed that he "was intentionally trying to injure himself," according to a police document obtained by The Washington Post.
Charles Pierce's response.

Police reaction to any death in police custody is about institutional protection. NPR's story on the indictment included audio; this is from the officers' lawyer, but is pretty much the standard disclaimer from police officials and unions—
No officer injured Mr. Gray, caused harm to Mr. Gray, and they are truly saddened by his death. These officers did nothing wrong.
But why should police be expected to take responsibility for wrong-doing, when no one in the Too Big To Fail club need ever lose sleep over the victims.

Early in the week, after a curfew had gone into effect, Rep. Elijah Cummings worked the streets of West Baltimore, encouraging people to go home. Meanwhile, a Shawn Hannity crew showed up to interfere with his efforts (Fox footage here was uploaded from a right-winger's blog).

In the video, an unidentified woman with Cummings says, "Too many people have died in custody of police," to be interrupted by Hannity, who relays to his minion the question, "Do you think the president rushed to judgement with this?" In a word, "No"—and Hannity talks over Rep. Cummings, who's trying to get back to business as the Fox crew pursues him.

The footage at that point makes obvious what Rep. Cummings observes of the crowd: "This is media here; the people have gone home!" As the minion continues to follow Cummings, Hannity's voice persists in whipping up the Two Minutes Hate.

Which actually was several minutes, each second excruciating to anyone with a sense of decency.

After Friday's indictment of the six officers, Rep. Cummings was again a voice of sanity.
Did they see this man who was a mother's child? Did they see this man who was just trying to get through life? Did they see him as a human being? And I have come here today to thank God that Marilyn Mosby and her team saw him, saw him.

4.19.2015

Oh, By The Way...

Documents obtained by Der Spiegel reveal how ISIS grew from seemingly nowhere, and who was its mastermind—
Samir Abd Muhammad al-Khlifawi was the real name of the Iraqi, whose bony features were softened by a white beard. But no one knew him by that name. Even his best-known pseudonym, Haji Bakr, wasn't widely known. But that was precisely part of the plan. The former colonel in the intelligence service of Saddam Hussein's air defense force had been secretly pulling the strings at IS for years....

...when the architect of the Islamic State died, he left something behind that he had intended to keep strictly confidential: the blueprint for this state. It is a folder full of handwritten organizational charts, lists and schedules, which describe how a country can be gradually subjugated.
If he was an indirect product, he was nevertheless a product of the US invasion of Iraq. So was his scheme: religion used as the pretense for a brutal power grab.
What Bakr put on paper, page by page, with carefully outlined boxes for individual responsibilities, was nothing less than a blueprint for a takeover. It was not a manifesto of faith, but a technically precise plan for an "Islamic Intelligence State" -- a caliphate run by an organization that resembled East Germany's notorious Stasi domestic intelligence agency.
This blueprint was implemented with astonishing accuracy in the ensuing months. The plan would always begin with the same detail: The group recruited followers under the pretense of opening a Dawah office, an Islamic missionary center. Of those who came to listen to lectures and attend courses on Islamic life, one or two men were selected and instructed to spy on their village and obtain a wide range of information....

The spies were told to note such details as whether someone was a criminal or a homosexual, or was involved in a secret affair, so as to have ammunition for blackmailing later. "We will appoint the smartest ones as Sharia sheiks," Bakr had noted. "We will train them for a while and then dispatch them." As a postscript, he had added that several "brothers" would be selected in each town to marry the daughters of the most influential families, in order to "ensure penetration of these families without their knowledge."

The spies were told to note such details as whether someone was a criminal or a homosexual, or was involved in a secret affair, so as to have ammunition for blackmailing later. "We will appoint the smartest ones as Sharia sheiks," Bakr had noted. "We will train them for a while and then dispatch them." As a postscript, he had added that several "brothers" would be selected in each town to marry the daughters of the most influential families, in order to "ensure penetration of these families without their knowledge."

The spies were to find out as much as possible about the target towns: Who lived there, who was in charge, which families were religious, which Islamic school of religious jurisprudence they belonged to, how many mosques there were, who the imam was, how many wives and children he had and how old they were. Other details included what the imam's sermons were like, whether he was more open to the Sufi, or mystical variant of Islam, whether he sided with the opposition or the regime, and what his position was on jihad. Bakr also wanted answers to questions like: Does the imam earn a salary? If so, who pays it? Who appoints him? Finally: How many people in the village are champions of democracy?

The agents were supposed to function as seismic signal waves, sent out to track down the tiniest cracks, as well as age-old faults within the deep layers of society -- in short, any information that could be used to divide and subjugate the local population. The informants included former intelligence spies, but also {Syrian] regime opponents who had quarreled with one of the rebel groups. Some were also young men and adolescents who needed money or found the work exciting. Most of the men on Bakr's list of informants... were in their early twenties, but some were as young as 16 or 17.

... there is a constantly recurring, core theme, which is meticulously addressed in organizational charts and lists of responsibilities and reporting requirements: surveillance, espionage, murder and kidnapping.

...

Sharia, the courts, prescribed piety -- all of this served a single goal: surveillance and control.
Digby links the report to what was already known about the Neo-Cons' post-invasion Iraq adventure, observing —
I think we always knew that the seeds of the current debacle were being planted during that period. But I didn't know before this latest article that ISIS specifically stemmed from Saddam's old coterie. It's certainly possible that his original idea has simply morphed into a catch-all terrorist "brand" kind of like Coke or Kleenex. But the fact that it was originally cooked up by Saddam's old henchmen as a way to re-take their territory using the current religious fanaticism of the moment as an inspiration is yet another terrifying lesson in the perils of blowback.