11.29.2009

November 2008: A Morning After

Photo: James Jordan
Around 11:30 the night of November 4, I started to hear horns honking, along with a roar—coming from the direction of the main thoroughfare, a couple blocks away. The roaring got louder, as students who had gathered on campus went into the streets and spontaneously marched through town.

The steady roar of joy and relief was still heard in my neighborhood, when I nodded out at 12:30.

The following morning was unusually sunny and warm—50 degrees or more, at 7:45. Which is when I was rushing to work, and running late, as usual.

Crossing a street, I was headed into the path of two other pedestrians: a black man and his daughter of about eight or nine. I hadn't seen them before on the route, and supposed the father must be walking the daughter to school, after staying up late to watch returns.

As our paths met, the father smiled, and said, "Good morning." I smiled back and said, "Hi." And rushed on—knowing I wanted to stop and say something more adequate. Despite the significance of the day, nothing came to me, in my usual inability to function at that hour.

A little later, I realized I could have said, "It's a beautiful morning, in so many ways..." Despite the missed moment of connection, it was clear how different everything feels. And how possibilities suddenly seem to be opening.

And things feel so different for now—when my clock radio came on that morning, Cokie Roberts was talking sense, to the effect of, "he won, it was big. I didn't understand why he spent time in New York and places he'd win anyway; now I do: it was about turnout, more Democrats, and showing he has the people behind him, and Congress..."

Sense emanating from the pundits can't last. And there's the grim likelihood that a Republican decision was made to not steal this election, in favor of leaving the staggering mess to the Democrats.

But even that can't mar the prospect of possibilities that have been suppressed for eight long years.

Just over a week later, the Yes Men pull off a "New York Times" edition dated July 4, 2009. Front page stories—
IRAQ WAR ENDS
Nation Sets Its Sights On Building Sane Economy

11.27.2009

November 2007: White House, Black Hole

NASA art, from "Top Ten Strangest Things in the Universe"
Beyond a black hole's gravitational border -- or event horizon -- neither matter nor light can escape.
Source of inspiration for the Cheney-Rove White House?

The question suggests itself, but the one Dan Froomkin asks is, "Where Are the E-Mails?"
The e-mails in question date from March 2003 to October 2005 -- a crucial period that includes the Iraq invasion, a presidential election and Hurricane Katrina.

White House officials have known for more than two years that the messages were deleted -- a clear violation of presidential records-preservation statutes. But the president's aides won't explain what happened, what sort of backups they have and what they're doing about it.

That obstinacy led a federal judge to step in yesterday and order the White House to preserve every bit of related data in its possession -- just to make sure nothing untoward happens while a civil suit by two open-government groups goes forward.
The suits are by Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) and National Security Archive lawyers.

Farther down in his column, Froomkin helpfully points out that this all came to light due to "Scandal Convergence"—after CIA leak special prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald notified Libby's lawyer, that "we have learned that not all e-mail of the Office of Vice President and the Executive Office of the President for certain time periods in 2003 was preserved through the normal archiving process on the White House computer system."

Froomkin also wants us to be clear that these are "Not the Same E-Mails"—
...there are two entirely different sets of missing e-mails: These and the ones that top White House aides including Karl Rove intentionally sent and received using their Republican National Committee e-mail accounts even while knowing full well that circumventing the White House servers for official business was a violation of federal law.

When congressional investigators looking into the suspicious firings of nine U.S. attorneys last year started asking after those e-mails, it turned out those were missing, too, just for different reasons: They'd been deleted by the RNC. The White House is ostensibly trying to recover those as well.
"Ostensibly" being a correct if polite word, which is to be expected from the accurate, polite Dan Froomkin. But knowing who is "trying to recover" the e-mails, the results will be predictable.

I have to admit that, when an unsolicited publication from Pakistan arrived at the Department Oval Office, I thought the envelope had a rather ironic stamp in its Supreme Court commemorative proclaiming "Justice for All."

That was last year. For much of this year, Pakistani lawyers have taken to the streets, protesting the government's attack on the judiciary, with removal of the chief justice. A struggle that continues–with Musharraf moving this month to suspend the Constitution, over 2500 lawyers in detention, and the chief justice remaining under house arrest.

As to own variety of rulers who answer to no one, Talking Points Memo offers "Bush Admin: What You Don't Know Can't Hurt Us, 2007 Version."

11.22.2009

November 2006: Psychopaths? We Got 'Em!

A faculty wit signs a report, then returns it to me—addressed to the Department's "Oval Office."

Maybe he wanted to suggest my address is exalted—not that our Department administrators are psychopaths.

My read is certainly the latter.

Speaking of the type... the loathsome Joe Lieberman keeps his Senate sinecure. Having been unable to win a primary and unwilling to abide by the results, he's re-elected—by Republicans.

But, they always have been responsible for his career. Some background from Howie Klein
In 1988 he challenged progressive Republican incumbent U.S. Senator Lowell Weicker-- attacking from the right-- and beat him. Lieberman ran a brutal and viciously negative campaign, mocking Weicker personally and even red-baiting him for being soft on Castro (William Buckley formed a PAC to raise money for Lieberman and later Jack Kemp called him "one of us.")
OpEdNews has more on Lieberman's history of Buckley/National Review backing here.

Now Lieberman has a new lease on doing Republican work—still Chairman of the Homeland Security committee, and ready to block a Katrina investigation that he claimed to want, pre-election.

As well as being in place to do as much other sabotage of the public good as he can. Kelly Caldwell
Where does he find the time?

Not only has Sen. Joe Lieberman been working overtime to smother health reform, he's parked himself squarely in the path of another badly-needed, long-awaited change.
Namely: preventing restoration of FEMA to the previous status it had as an autonomous agency, before it was subsumed and subverted by DHS.

In other news of psychopaths: Bush waits until the day after the election to announce Rumsfeld's resignation—which Rummy submitted just before the vote.

Think Progress updates the post above
—The word "Iraq" doesn't appear in former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld's resignation letter. Neither does the word "war."
And Clever Sister forwards this amusing post-midterm piece from the Washington Post: Republicans' Angry Factions Point Fingers At Each Other. Michael Grunwald writes that—
After minutes upon minutes of soul-searching, Republicans are now in recrimination mode. And the GOP's various factions all agree: This wouldn't have happened if the party had listened to us.
And in Grunwald's description, finger-pointers attribute the party's losses to its rejection of "popular causes such as the minimum wage, embryonic stem cell research and lobbying reforms while ignoring health-care issues that did not involve Terri Schiavo." [!]

Along with communiqués addressed to the Oval Office, the month at work opens with a mysterious absence by Jesus' Best Administrative Assistant. As the hours go by without my hearing a word of explanation, I wonder if she has finally been Raptured™ away.

"Medical emergency?" suggests Clever sister.

Perhaps... Could there have been another starfish attack?

The mystery is solved late in the morning, when Dr. G. Zuss asks me to do something. Taking being spoken to as an opening for me to speak, I ask if Jesus' BAA will be in today. She will, is the answer. But sometime later—because, "the dog is delivering."

CS: "Family sick leave, then?"

Jesus' BAA is out of my life for the entire week of Thanksgiving. In the process of straightening out a mess she created, I cc her on an e-mail. Then get her so very professional out-of-office message: the dates she will be away; who to contact for assistance; and—
Have a very blessed Thanksgiving!

11.15.2009

November 2005: Lies, Spies, Pies

With no major elections to propagandize this year, Bill O'Reilly has been busy with his "War on Christmas" publicity grabbing shtick.

Yes, the threat is all around—as in the incessant Christmas fundraising at the public institution where I work.

But anything to distract the masses is a win for Republicans.

On another, highly orchestrated, win: Rolling Stone publishes James Bamford's, The Man Who Sold the War. Bamford documents the activities of—and publicly-funded fortune taken in by—"Bush's general in the propaganda war," John Rendon.

After the CIA, in an "extraordinary transfer of secret authority," hired the Rendon Group in 1991—
Rendon assembled a group of anti-Saddam militants, personally gave them their name -- the Iraqi National Congress [INC] -- and served as their media guru and "senior adviser" as they set out to engineer an uprising against Saddam. It was as if President John F. Kennedy had outsourced the Bay of Pigs operation to the advertising and public-relations firm of J. Walter Thompson.
Rendon helped to install as head of the INC Ahmad Chalabi— whose "primary focus was to drag us into a war," former Baghdad CIA chief Whitley Bruner tells Bamford. On Chalabi's behalf—
Rendon made considerable headway with the INC, but following the group's failed coup attempt against Saddam in 1996, the CIA lost confidence in Chalabi and cut off his monthly paycheck. But Chalabi and Rendon simply switched sides, moving over to the Pentagon, and the money continued to flow.
Under Chalabi's direction in 2001—and with the new political opportunities after September 11 of that year—came Adnan al-Hadieri's fake testimony to being a civil engineer who had helped bury tons of biological, chemical, and nuclear weapons still hidden in Iraq. The phony information then needing to be disseminated, Paul Moran, a freelancer in Bahrain with access to Australian Broadcasting Corporation work—as well as being an employee of Rendon's—was in place to broadcast the story.

Next—
The INC's choice for the worldwide print exclusive was equally easy: Chalabi contacted Judith Miller of The New York Times. Miller, who was close to I. Lewis Libby and other neoconservatives in the Bush administration, had been a trusted outlet for the INC's anti-Saddam propaganda for years. Not long after the CIA polygraph expert slipped the straps and electrodes off al-Haideri and declared him a liar, Miller flew to Bangkok to interview him under the watchful supervision of his INC handlers...despite her vaunted intelligence sources, she claimed not to know about the results of al-Haideri's lie-detector test. Instead, she reported that unnamed "government experts" called his information "reliable and significant" -- thus adding a veneer of truth to the lies.

Her front-page story, which hit the stands on December 20th, 2001, was exactly the kind of exposure Rendon had been hired to provide. AN IRAQI DEFECTOR TELLS OF WORK ON AT LEAST 20 HIDDEN WEAPONS SITES, declared the headline...

For months, hawks inside and outside the administration had been pressing for a pre-emptive attack on Iraq. Now, thanks to Miller's story, they could point to "proof" of Saddam's "nuclear threat." The story, reinforced by Moran's on-camera interview with al-Haideri on the giant Australian Broadcasting Corp., was soon being trumpeted by the White House and repeated by newspapers and television networks around the world. It was the first in a long line of hyped and fraudulent stories that would eventually propel the U.S. into a war with Iraq -- the first war based almost entirely on a covert propaganda campaign targeting the media.[my bold]
Bamford describes more levels of the post-9/11 war propaganda effort—
Still another newly formed propaganda operation in which Rendon played a major part was the Office of Global Communications, which operated out of the White House and was charged with spreading the administration's message on the War in Iraq...The office also worked closely with the White House Iraq Group, whose high-level members, including recently indicted Cheney chief of staff Lewis Libby, were responsible for selling the war to the American public.
In a suicide bombing on day three of the invasion, Paul Moran—
freelance journalist and Rendon employee [became] the first member of the media to be killed in the war – a war he had covertly helped to start.

...

Although Moran was gone, the falsified story about weapons of mass destruction that he...had broadcast around the world lived on. Seven months earlier, as President Bush was about to argue his case for war before the U.N., the White House had given prominent billing to al-Haideri's fabricated charges. In a report ironically titled "Iraq: Denial and Deception," the administration referred to al-Haideri by name and detailed his allegations -- even though the CIA had already determined them to be lies. The report was placed on the White House Web site on September 12th, 2002, and remains there today. One version of the report even credits Miller's article for the information.
Which brings us to the little matter of the indictment of I. Lewis Libby, on one count of obstruction of justice, and two each of perjury and making false statements.

At work, the topic is raised by one of the occasional visitors who braves trying to inject a little reality into the room. Jesus' Best Administrative Assistant drops her normal mask of feverishly happy righteousness, to say—with quite the cold little sneer—"How can there be an indictment? There was no crime! Everyone knew she wasn't undercover!"

"She" being Valerie Plame, and Jesus' BAA sure has received her instructions on this subject.

Talking points of the delusional aside, it's easy to see that, if Cheney's immediate objective was to discredit and silence Plame's husband, it was an unexpected win for the warmongers to simultaneously sabotage years of undercover work in weapons of mass destruction proliferation.

There is no shortage of bizarre twists to be found in observing the criminal outfit that runs this country. This reminds me of how, after Plame's cover was blown two years ago, some outraged former CIA people appeared on Nightline.

Clever Sister and I watched the program together. And were amazed to realize: the CIA are the good guys in this!

Watching interviewees with their identities concealed, we were struck by hearing a woman whose peculiar vocal quality was apparent even through electronic distortion.

It took no more than a second or two for CS to catch on: "It's Julia Child, former spy!"

A couple days later, we happen be browsing in a remainder bookstore, when CS spots the book at top. Recipes not from the Culinary Institute of America, but courtesy of the United States Central Intelligence Agency Family Advisory Board.

But, hey: that mango pie recipe sure is tastier and more wholesome than the concoctions cooked up by our neocons and their subcontractors...

In other literary efforts, Libby himself made a notable contribution to the crowded genre of salacious novels written by members of the Party of Family Values. Lauren Collins, on Scooter's Sex Shocker
Libby has a lot to live up to as a conservative author of erotic fiction...from Safire...to Buckley...to Ehrlichman...to O'Reilly...extracurricular creative writing has long been an outlet for ideas that might not fly at, say, the National Prayer Breakfast. In one of Lynne Cheney's books, a Republican vice-president dies of a heart attack while having sex with his mistress.

...

So, how does Libby stack up against the competition? This question was put to Nancy Sladek, the editor of Britain's Literary Review, which, each year, holds a contest for bad sex writing in fiction. (In 1998, someone nominated the Starr Report.) Sladek agreed to review a few passages from Libby. "That's a bit depraved, isn't it, this kind of thing about bears and young girls? That's particularly nasty, and the other ones are just boring," she said. "God, they’re an odd bunch, these Republicans." Unlike their American counterparts, she said, Tories haven't taken much to sex writing. "They usually just get caught," she said.
Well, ours certainly have much worse crimes to answer for. And they've been "caught," all right—just not stopped.

Instead, we get what happens to someone like Steven Kurtz
...a Professor of Art at SUNY Buffalo and a founding member, with his late wife, Hope, of the internationally acclaimed art and theater collective Critical Art Ensemble...

In May 2004 the Kurtzes were preparing to present Free Range Grain, a project examining GM agriculture, at the Massachusetts Museum of Contemporary Art... when Hope Kurtz died of heart failure. Police who responded to Kurtz's 911 call deemed the couple's art suspicious, and called the FBI. The art materials consisted of several petri dishes containing three harmless bacteria cultures, and a mobile lab to test food labeled "organic" for the presence of genetically modified ingredients. As Kurtz explained, these materials had been safely displayed in museums and galleries throughout Europe and North America with absolutely no risk to the public.

The next day, however, as Kurtz was on his way to the funeral home, he was illegally detained by agents from the FBI and Joint Terrorism Task Force, who informed him he was being investigated for "bioterrorism."
This month, Prof. Kurtz is released from pre-trial supervision, over the objections of the DOJ.

And it will take fours years before Kurtz is finally cleared of all charges. When he will say, after being asked for a statement–
I don't have a statement, but I do have questions. As an innocent man, where do I go to get back the four years the Department of Justice stole from me? As a taxpayer, where do I go to get back the millions of dollars the FBI and Justice Department wasted persecuting me? And as a citizen, what must I do to have a Justice Department free of partisan corruption so profound it has turned on those it is sworn to protect?
These have become sadly mundane questions we can all ask of this regime.

11.08.2009

November 2004: Thieves In The Night

Grand Lake Theater
Or to be more precise, thieves in the early morning, just after midnight.

Thom Hartmann
...I'd been doing live election coverage... during the 12:20 a.m. Associated Press Radio News feed, I was startled to hear the reporter detail how Karen Hughes had earlier sat George W. Bush down to inform him that he'd lost the election. The exit polls were clear: Kerry was winning in a landslide. "Bush took the news stoically," noted the AP report.

But then the computers reported something different. In several pivotal states.
Of course the thieves also had been hard at work in daylight—around the country, and for years—as seen in stories compiled here, and the Project Censored report here.

My state appears to have had a fairly clean process. But we also have a Republican State legislature and Secretary of State, and major polling place changes were timed for this particular election. I worked outside a polling place in my majority Democratic county, and nearly all the black voters who arrived were directed to a different location.

Still, all was going well before before midnight, when I went to bed. It was a very different story in the morning, when the mass media reversed the earlier, more honest reporting.

Greg Palast, here, on the depressing math of grand theft in Ohio and New Mexico; the quantities of Democratic votes not counted; the lack of Democratic Party response.

The rank and file, on the other hand, are outraged. A grassroots group in Ohio holds public hearings, where witnesses testify to how majority black precincts were shorted on voting machines. And about the setup at Kenyon College, where students were forced to wait in line for 10 to 12 hours.

Testimony includes that of a woman whose friend's husband died during the three-hour period he was alone, while his wife waited to vote.

Kerry's concession was almost immediate. Presumably, what the party establishment wants. And probably a careerist's move that Kerry himself wants—he must believe this is a gentleman's game, and that if he shows acceptable sportsmanship, he'll play again.

In the general post-November 2 horror, there was a small thing that struck me.

In all my time volunteering with local Dems this year, I sold buttons and yard signs at lots of public events. And each time, I watched excited kids line up to buy buttons—then saw them go to their parents and beg money to buy more buttons.

One of the designs was an oversized button with a portrait of Kerry. Adult buyers mostly avoided that one. But kids were drawn to it. They seemed to like Kerry's face, but more importantly, they trusted him—he looked to them like a strong adult who would banish the scary monster.

Last month, Clever Sister had forwarded this: Kids Pick Kerry to Be the Next President
NEW YORK - Kid power! Democrat John Kerry (news - web sites) is the winner, and the rest of the country should pay attention because the vote on Nickelodeon's Web site has correctly chosen the president of the United States in the past four elections.
It wasn't wishful thinking—Kerry did win.

But he and the Party failed the kids.

They failed the voters who waited so many hours in a miserable November rain.

They failed the country we want back—in place of a "Homeland."